Plant family characters | Malvaceae

Observed by Marion MacleanMarion Maclean is knowledgeable about PlantsMarion Maclean's earned reputation in PlantsMarion Maclean's earned reputation in PlantsMarion Maclean's earned reputation in PlantsMarion Maclean's earned reputation in PlantsMarion Maclean's earned reputation in Plants on 3rd March 2013
Plant family characters | Malvaceae
Malvaceae-leaves
Malvaceae-stipules
Malvaceae-hairs
Malvaceae-flower
Malvaceae-epicalyx
Malvaceae-bits
Malvaceae-bits2 - Copyright David Gwynne-Evans
Malvaceae-fruit
Malvaceae-seeds - copyright David Gwynne-Evans

Malvaceae (sensu lato)
[Malvaceae - including Sterculiaceae, Tiliaceae and Bombacaceae]
(Subclass: Dilleniidae - Order: Malvales)

Diagnostic features: Malvaceae has no features exclusive to the family, therefore it is a set of features, which are:

  1. Leaf arrangement: alternate (pic 1) (present in many families)
  2. Stipules: present (pic 2) (present in many families)
  3. Stellate (star-shaped) hairs, usually (pic 3) (present in many families including Annonaceae, Asteraceae, Brassicaceae, Euphorbiaceae etc.)
  4. Flowers: bisexual (or unisexual), regular (pic 4) (present in many families)
  5. Calyx: 3-5-merous, often subtended by an epicalyx (pic 5) (epicalyx also present in Caryophyllaceae, Neuradaceae, Roridulaceae and Rosaceae)
  6. Corolla: 5-merous, petals free (not joined together in a tube) (pic 4) (present in many families)
  7. Male whorl (androecium): numerous stamens monadelphous (joined into a tube around the style and joined to it) (pic 6) (present in several families including Amaranthaceae, Fabaceae and Geranciaceae)
  8. Female whorl (gynoecium): ovary usually superior (above the attachment of the petals), composed of 1-many fused carpels (locules, chambers) with axile placentation. Style is branched (pic 6)
  9. Fruit: dry, capsular or schizocarpic (pods that break up into one-seeded sections) (pic 7) (except *Malvaviscus which has a berry)
  10. Seeds: often covered in fine hairs, usually contain little/no endosperm and have a straight or curved embryo (pic 8)

Full description:
Habit herbs, shrubs or trees, usually with stellate hairs, sometimes prickly or with small scales. Leaves alternate, simple, entire to digitately lobed or partite, or palmate, usually palmately veined; stipules free, usually narrow or setaceous, often deciduous. Flowers regular, bisexual, sometimes unisexual on the same plant in the Sterculiodae, often showy, usually pedicelled, basically in thyrses with cymose partial inflorescences, but usually solitary or fascicled in leaf axils or racemose to paniculate; with or without epicalyx of 3-many free or connate segments. Calyx (3-)5-lobed or entire; lobes valvate. Petals 5, free but often adnate to base of staminal tube, convolute, rarely 0. Stamens many, hypogynous; filaments united into a staminal tube surrounding style (Malvoideae), outer whorl often reduced to staminodes or lacking (Sterculiodeae), tube ending in 5 small teeth to truncate (tribes Malvavisceae and Hibisceae) or split at apex into many filaments (tribe Malveae); anthers 1(2)-thecous, with longitudinal slits; pollen usually spinulose. Gynoecium superior, of 2-many, ± fused carpels with axile placentation, arranged around central persistent axis (torus or columella), with 1-many anatropous to campylotropous, bitegmic ovules, with zig-zag micropyles, in each locule/carpel; style simple, globose or club-shaped or more often branched, with branches as many or twice as many as carpels. Fruit a loculicidal (longitudinally dehiscing along the capsule wall between the partitions of the locule [the opposite is septicidal, dehiscing on the septum]) capsule or schizocarp, usually breaking into dehiscent or indehiscent carpels, rarely fleshy. Seeds reniform (kidney-shaped), subglobose or obovoid, glabrous or hairy; cotyledons folded; endosperm oily, proteinaceous, copious to 0.

Worldwide ± 90 genera, ± 2000 species; sthn Afr.: genera 22 (7 exotic), species ± 165. The family comprises many weeds. Sporadic escapes from cultivation include *Alcea rosea L. the Hollyhock, *Lagunaria patersonia G.Don, the Pyramid tree and *Malvaviscus arboreus Cav., the Wax mallow.

Key to Subfamilies and Genera of Malvaceae of southern Africa : The links won't work if there are not yet observations of the taxon.

1a Gynoecium apocarpous (carpels free); petals, staminodes and epicalyx always lacking; androgynophore (extension of the receptacle between the petals and stamens on which the androecium and gynoecium are borne) present; flowers usually unisexual Sterculioideae S1

    S1 Stamens many, with anthers capitate on apex of staminal column Sterculia
    S2 Stamens 10(12), with anthers in a regular or wavy whorl around apex of staminal column Cola

1b Gynoecium usually syncarpous (carpels fused); petals usually present; androgynophore, staminodes and epicalyx present or absent; flowers usually hemaphroditic (bisexual) 2

2a Stamens usually free Grewioideae G1

    G1a Fruit a somewhat fleshy to dry, (1)2-4-lobed drupe Grewia
    G1b Fruit a glabrous, hairy or densely bristly capsule G2

    G2a Flowers white, pinkish or mauve, 4-merous; some stamens sterile with no anthers or, if sterile stamens very few or apparently absent, the filaments nodose Sparrmannia
    G2b Flowers yellow, 5-merous, sometimes 4-merous but then capsule pod-like; all the stamens fertile, filaments never nodose G3

    G3a Fruits globose, bristly, spiny or with conical, spine-tipped tubercles; ovules 2 per locule Triumfetta
    G3b Fruits usually long and pod-like, rarely ellipsoid or ovoid; ovules more than 2 per locule or, if only 2, then capsule smooth; leaves often tailed at the base Corchorus

2b Stamens usually forming a tube 3

3a Anthers usually monothecal (one pollen pouch), rarely paired; staminodes always absent; sepals usually fused more than 1/3 4
3b Anthers not monothecal; staminodes usually present; sepals usually fused less than 1/3 5

4a Trees, exceptionally shrubs; carpels 2-5; fruits capsules or indehiscent; endocarp often pubescent (abundant kapok or sparse pubescence); seeds usually glabrous; pollen usually without spines. Bombacoideae (Adansonia)
4b Shrubs or herbs, exceptionally trees; carpels (3-)5-many; fruits schizocarps, less frequently capsules, rarely berries; endocarp glabrous; seeds sometimes pubescent; pollen spinose. Malvoideae (see key below)

5a Flowers usually in axillary cymes (oldest flowers at the apex) or solitary; epicalyx present; petals often persistent, flat, neither cucullate nor with apical appendage; cotyledons usually bifid; pollen usually sphaeroidal and spinose Dombeyoideae D1

    D1 Fibrous herbs or undershrubs; petals becoming detached, persisting like a cap on the ovary; 5 fertile stamens Melhania
    D2 Shrubs or small trees; petals becoming papery, persistent; 10-15 fertile stamens Dombeya

5b Flowers variously arranged, often in sympodia; epicalyx usually absent (the corresponding bracts usually subtending flowers); petals usually caducous (falling early), sometimes cucullate (hooded or cowled) and/or with apical appendage; cotyledons only exceptionally bifid; pollen not spinose Byttnerioideae B1

    B1a Ovary 5-locular B2
    B1b Ovary 1-locular Waltheria

    B2a Locules 2-ovulate; filaments ± connate into a tube; anthers oblong-elliptic, glabrous Melochia
    B2b Locules 3-many-ovulate; filaments free or slightly connate at the base, ± obovate or tuberculate-cruciform; anthers tapering to an acuminate apex, pubescent, pilose or ciliolate Hermannia

Key to genera of Malvoideae

1a Style branches twice as many as carpels (style branches usually 10, carpels 5) (tribe Malvavisceae) 2
1b Style branches as many as carpels (5-many) or style undivided and stigma more or less entire: 3

2a Epicalyx of (3-)5-16 filiform to broadly ovate, segments usually free (not joined at base); carpels without hooked spines Pavonia
2b Epicalyx of 5 lobes fused in lower third; carpels with hooked spines *Urena

3a Fruit a capsule or indehiscent and woody to ± fleshy; staminal tube toothed at apex to truncate, bearing anthers on most or much of its surface (tribe Hibisceae) 4
3b Fruit a schizocarp with mericarps eventually separating from a persistent axis; staminal tube split at apex into many filaments (tribe Malveae) 12

4a Style simple (rarely very slightly divided at the tip), apex 5-lobed or clavate with ± coherent stigmas 5
4b Style divided apically into distinct branches; stigmas capitate to club-shaped 10

5a Calyx spathaceous, thin, splitting laterally and deciduous with the corolla *Abelmoschus
5b Calyx not splitting laterally, truncate or regularly lobed, persistent 6

6a Calyx distinctly 5-lobed 7
6b Calyx truncate, entire or at most dentate or undulate 8

7a Calyx with rows of black oil glands along veins Cienfugosia
7b Calyx without black oil glands Radyera

8a Epicalyx of 3 large, leaf-like, persistent bracts Gossypium
8b Epicalyx of 3-8 small, narrow, deciduous bracts 9

9a Fruit indehiscent, woody or somewhat fleshy Thespesia
9b Fruit a loculicidally dehiscent capsule Thespesia (was Azanza [included here but probably separable (Cassine)])

10a Style 3(4)-branched; epicalyx of 3 large, leaf-like, persistent bracts Gossypioides
10b Style 5-branched; epicalyx of 5-20 variable bracts, occasionally absent 11

11a Ovules and seeds solitary in each locule Kosteletzkya
11b Ovules and (mostly) seeds 2 or more in each locule Hibiscus

12a Epicalyx absent 13
12b Epicalyx present 16

13a Ovules 2 or more per locule; seeds mostly 2 or more per mericarp or sometimes 1 by abortion 14
13b Ovules 1 per locule; seeds 1 per mericarp 15

14a Mericarps 5-40, not divided Abutilon
14b Mericarps 3-5, ± divided into 2 compartments by a transverse constriction Wissadula

15a Corolla cream to orange, rarely white; lateral walls or mericarps not disintegrating before fruit breaks up Sida
15b Corolla blue; lateral walls of mericarps disintegrating before fruit breaks up *Anoda

16a Stigmas ± apical, usually with distinctly greater diameter than rest of style branches 17
16b Stigmas decurrent on adaxial side of filiform to narrowly clavate style branches 22

17a Ovules 1 per locule 18
17b Ovules or seeds 2 or more per locule 19

18a Petals yellow; mericarps with 1 apical and 2 dorsal awns pointing outward *Malvastrum
18b Petals pink, mauve, purple or white; mercarps rounded or mucronate at apex Anisodontea

19a Mericarps ± divided into 2 compartments by a transverse partition 20
19b Mericarps not divided into 2 compartments 21

20a Plants prostrate, biennial to annual *Modiola
20b Plants erect to decumbent, perennial Anisodontea

21a Lateral walls of mericarps with a clearly demarcated reticulate-fenestrate area in lower third *Sphaeralcea
21b Lateral walls of mericarps smooth or variously ridged to obscurely reticulate-fenestrate Anisodontea

22a Epicalyx of 6-10 bracts Althaea
22b Epicalyx of 3 bracts 23

23a Epicalyx bracts fused at base, broad and leaf-like *Lavatera
23b Epicalyx bracts free to base, mostly linear to lanceolate Malva

Please note that plant families are based on ovary and ovule characteristics which are generally not readily visible in the field, and often require a microscope. I have tried to make these descriptions as painless as possible with macro characteristics, but sometimes I have had to resort to the small and annoying.

Malvaceae on iSpot

David Gwynne-Evans has kindly allowed me to use some of his photos.
Robert (Cassine) generously helped with the subfamily key, proofreading and some references. Thank you Robert!

References:

Bayer, C. [et al. 1999], Fay, M. F., de Bruijn, A. Y., Savolainen, V., Morton, C. M., Kubitzki, K., & Chase, M. W. 1999. Support for an expanded family concept of Malvaceae within a recircumscribed order Malvales: A combined analysis of plastid atpB and rbcL DNA sequences. Bot. J. Linnean Soc. 129: 267-303.
Bayer, C., & Kubitzki, K. 2002. Malvaceae, pp. 225-311, in Kubitzki, K. (ed.), The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants. V. Flowering Plants. Dicotyledons. Malvales, Capparales and Non-betalain Caryophyllales. Springer, Berlin.
Heywood, V. 1993. Flowering plants of the world. Oxford University Press, New York.
Heywood, V, Brummitt, R.K., Culham, A. & Seberg, O. 2007. Flowering plant families of the world. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
Leistner, O. A. 2000. Seed Plants of southern Africa: families and genera. Strelitzia 10.

Location: R62, Montagu
Identifications
Species interactions

No interactions present.

Other observations of Malvaceae

Comments

I like it

Never heard of an epicalyx before.
But which part of this is a purely Malvaceae characteristic? A calyx with an epicalyx?
Shouldn't you also ID the species or are you deliberately sticking to the family?

Sticking to family

because the idea is to load several photos that show the family characters. In which case there will probably be several species involved depending on the best photos one can get of a feature.

The epicalyx is a feature of the Malvaceae. Cannot remember offhand if it is found in any other family. If iSpotters want me to go ahead with this idea, then I will make sure that everything is clear and labelled etc. And if other spotters would like to help out with this, then they can load family or even genus obs. I'm thinking of people like Charles Stirton who is a pea specialist and an Aspalathus fundi, and would be waaaay more qualified to load a Fabaceae family thing than me.

Epicalyx

Flowers of the Rosaceae family also have an epicalyx.

Good idea about the family/genus features! Maybe these observations can be tagged with a keyword that would make them easily searchable for future reference.

Woops

I see Martin already had the idea of tags - I second that!

tags and taxonomy

No need to bother with tags. You can search by families easily: just click on the Taxonomy Links. That is what they are for!

Any identification that links to the dictionary is automatically "pretagged" for any item and level in the dictionary, from subgenus to Kingdom. You merely have to click on the level in the Taxonomy Links to access all this information.
Please don't add tags for taxonomy links: they are 1000% superfluous.

If a "level" is not in the iSpot dictionary, please request it - with a reference to allow checking and to see which sublevels link to which level.

Tag features, not names

I wasn't thinking of family names in tags but rather important features. For example, someone observing an epicalyx on a flower could search for that and find family descriptions for Malvaceae and Rosaceae (and ...?)

tags

That would work great!

!!

I dont know if iSpot is ready for this, but it is a grand IDEA!

We have a request in for searches to be able to have a banner page. The way this works is that if you search, the Banner Page will the top page. This was requested in the light of some projects: but it wont happen in the next few months!
For instance, if you contribute to the Protea Colour Survey and you click on the tag, then you get: http://ispot.org.za/taxonomy/term/6692 - but there is not context: it would be really cool to get the banner page http://ispot.org.za/ProteaColour as the first item, allowing one to find out what it was all about.

The same would apply to all searches - for instance to Malvaceae.

But there can only be one banner page. So we need to plan accordingly. I would suggest if you are interested, then you should please be happy to include additional pictures and artwork done by others (if they meet your standards).
I would like to see to for plant families:
* the floral formula
* the floral diagramme
* the diagnostic features.

Contributions can be done in the comments, but the author should please consider adding the most useful of these to the "description" be editing the observation from time to time.

This is a marvelous idea: lets make it really work.

My only hesitancy is that
* EoL is supposed to be doing this already. Can we compete or do better? In fact, SANBI is supposed to be doing the southern African pages for EoL, but with staff issues this will be a labour of several lifetimes. And in fact, Wiki is doing this already and even better: and we can all add content to Wiki!
* This is a huge task: there are hundreds of plant families, and "millions" (sorry could not resist) insect families, not to mention birds and fish and "others". Can we really do a reasonable job?
* And why only families? Why not orders, tribes, genera and even species? But plant families is a great idea! A good starting point and a manageable one.
* How do we stop enthusiasts from identifying the genus or species of a family? I dont know of any way, although of course the "Likely ID" is what we want and we can easily 'outvote' any other identifications (but it wont look neat!).
* How do we manage the politics? Wont tony's nose be out of joint if fynbos posts the Protea Family page? How do we work together with our coterie of prima donnas, experts, enthusiasts, sensitive personas and hypercritical ogres?

But dont let my problems hinder us. Let's not find problems but rather find solutions. This is a great idea - Lets go for it!

plus:

Note though,

* that all observations ID'd to only family, will show up under other observations on the carousel. This is not an issue - it will allow one to check the the family is correct.

Forum!

Can I please move this discussion to a forum: where do you want it?

* plants

* Site Feedback: as its own topic - called what?

Can you then please change the description of this topic to be about Malvaceae and not about this great idea.

Forum

plants

Can the family character pages be loaded as forum topics rather than obs? I think that would be a better idea...?

To do this all by myself will take the rest of natural life. Please please please help me. I think format has to be agreed upon. I will do one page (let's stick with Malvaceae for now) with the format I think is good, and then people can comment on that until we've got something that's agreed on by the majority. Then the rest of pages can be set up the same way.

Unfortunately you cannot load

Unfortunately you cannot load pictures on the forum. Special pages have to be created for loading pictures and they are reduced to small pictures (see http://ispot.org.za/ProteaColour).
Observations are cool!

Oops!

Sorry: I missed the plant request, but it applies to animal orders, families and tribes as well. its in the feedback forum.

Great idea,

is what I think! I'm too reliant on intuitive recognition and would find this helpful. I too didn't know about an epicalyx.

To make searching such records really effective, it might be useful to have tags mentioning the distinguishing features of the family, eg. epicalyx here. Then searches about features could point to the family.

Please do!

It will be a great help for learning the correct botanical terms for the various structures. It would also be wonderful if someone could do the same for those tricky descriptive words like villous, puberulous, terete, etc.

Lara

Glossary

I am busy with a web glossary which is far from finished, but perhaps I should load it up anyway coz it seems people need it. And then just fix it up as we go along...

forum!

As a forum item please, not as an observation!

Not a forum

A completely separate web page (attached to my website). It is nearly ready for uploading. Then people can save the page onto their computers and use it offline as well.

Excellent idea Marion - keep

Excellent idea Marion - keep up the good work.

Eric Harley

Thank you thank you

Learning by pictures is waaaaay easier than trying to read one's grand new specialist plant book with dictionary on the side, and this is taking the iSpot having-it-all-in-one-place thing yet another step further.

reply vs comment

I wish people would use replies correctly. These "added" comments hang incoherently as isolated thoughts at the end like vultures scavenging the conversation.

No, my vulture is correct

It was a direct reaction to the observation, before much of the conversation even happened, and didn't have anything to do with the above discussion topics.

I agree with you that it doesn't always look neat, but to me comments directly responding to the original observation are very definitely not replies, even if more than one person might share similar sentiments.

Or do you prefer us to understand "reply" to mean both "reply" and "agree", etc?

I agree with Magriet

:) And the vulture is a noble bird, net so by die weg.

vulture.

Sorry, not all the comments were not the best approach. Case of hat fits, wear it.

Now who was it who wore the vulture hat?:

Neville's grandma, and of course Snape.

(Not that I am condoning the use of Vulture hats please! - just to forestall a slurry of replies).

Reply

Some comments it's better not to reply to, in case the poster needs to edit them, for example your list below of Malvaceae Diagnostics might well need further editing/additions.
Looking at Malvaceae's list of Child Members. Where's the logic in the order of them? They are not alphabetical so it's not particularly user-friendly.

Okay whoa wait okes!!!

I'll get this done later! I actually have to earn a living in between iSpot and rambles in the veld (hard to believe I know!). So gee kans, and I'll do this later today! We'll use this ob as a trial run. So any comments, suggestions, additions, subtractions, multiplications and divisions can be hammered out here. Then the other family obs will be PURTY!

Oh?

Oh?
I wish that they would tell me when they make updates like these. As administrator I dont see these little changes (like cannot update if replied to) so I am totally ignorant of what has changed - or when it changed!

Please confirm: you can always edit the "description" details - if so that the description below cannot be edited is no big deal: one can post corrections as replies.

Editing

You mean descriptions that go with an observation? yes, you can always edit those.

No big deal

No big deal here, but it will become a big headache if, for example, Marion wants to retain editing abilities to the very first posting in a forum topic that deals with the characteristics of Malvaceae.
One reply and she cannot make any additions or corretions.
SO: We'd have to be quite disciplined at not replying to the first posting, but rather keep all our feedback below it.

No big deal

If Marion summarizes the family features and description and diagnostics and summary in her "description" then there is no issue at all. She can edit and insert and improve for as long as she likes. Keep the comments as comments not as "content" - put the ideal version as the description!

It will work perfectly! And with cut and paste, transferring blocks of text is trivial.

Quite honestly your concern is meaningless if we use the "description" as the 'content' and the comments as the storyboard or review pages or comments.

Ok

I thought the plan was to move all this to a forum topic. I must have misunderstood.

Forum topic

No - just the concept! The individual family accounts stay observations.

Ooh

Suddenly I can edit my comments that have been
replied to. That's nice!

EDIT: oh no I can't actually. Was looking at a comment that hadn't been replied to. Sorry to cause confusion.

Malvaceae Diagnostics

Diagnostic features:
star-shaped hairs, epicalyx often present, staminal column often present.

Description:
Trees, shrubs and perennials.
Leaves alternate, often palmate or deeply divided, margins often toothed;
stipules usually present.
Inflorescences in axillary clusters or single, usually bisexual, radially symmetrical.
Flowers often yellow or pink, cup-shaped or furled;
often with a whorl of bracts below resembling the sepals (= epicalyx);
sepals 3-5, fused below to form a cup;
petals 5, separate, usually fused to the staminal column at base, furled umbrella-like in bud;
stamens 5 or 10 to many, filaments free, usually joined below to form a tubular column, anthers 1 chambered;
ovary superior, 1-many chambers, ovules 1-many per chamber, placentation axile, style simple or often branched, with 1 or 2X the number of chambers, protruding from the tip of the stamen tube.
Fruit usually dry, often fragmenting into segments.

Worldwide: mainly tropics
3500 spp
(now includes Sterculiaceae and Tilliaceae)

References

I would suggest that the references used for the plant family descriptions/features be included in the observation.

Sources:

Terry Trinder Smith: Western Cape Plants
Manning: Fynbos
Heywood: Flowering Plants.
Wiki

Give or take it will be the same sources throughout.

Give or take

The bestest cladistic perspectives/overviews on/of plant higher taxon characteristics are probably those found in Judd, Campbell, Kellogg, Stevens & Donoghue (2007).

-- Beetledude

>>> now includes Sterculiaceae and Tilliaceae

... and Bombacaceae.

-- Beetledude

List of Subfamilies

List of southern African subfamilies would be good. Herewith 6 of the 9 currently recognized.

1. Grewioideae: Triumfetta, Corchorus, Grewia
2. Byttnerioideae: Hermannia
3. Sterculioideae: Sterculia,Cola
4. Dombeyoideae: Dombeya, Melhania
5. Malvoideae : Hibiscus, Sida, Abutilon
6. Bombacoideae : Adansonia

Robert

Thank you Robert!

Yes I'm getting there. I'm just trying to work out how to combine the keys to the subfamilies and genera from the separate families I have access to. If you have a key to the subfamilies and/or genera that you are willing to/allowed to let us load here, please could you click on the link below and email them to me?

Thank you

I could try adapting the one by Bayer

and omit the additional 3 subfamilies. It is rather technical because it has to include all the exceptions? R

Any and all help gratefully accepted!

Thank you, Robert, I'll take whatever you've got. I don't wish to waste time on reinventing the wheel. I am also trying to make the text as user-friendly as possible, with explanations of botanical terms, so I will try to detechnicalise it a bit (also to negate copyright issues).

Forum implemented at:

Forum implemented at: http://ispot.org.za/node/185272

Description updated: @Marion please confirm that you can edit the description.

Edit

Yes, can edit forum topic and this ob. Query: iSpot does not have Bombacaceae included in Malvaceae, though all my other references do. Please confirm iSpot's stance on this.

[Malvaceae was not a good choice for me to start with, it just came up. Anyway I'll do my best. I am awaiting a confirmation from someone to use some of their pics for the Family page, and can carry on then.]

Brilliant!!

This is magic! A fantastic standard for anyone contributing to help with.

Some requests:
* Please dont put in the little notelets about features needing a microscope: they dont fit in and detract from the message. Anyone sufficiently interested to interpret your notes will know that sort of thing already. And click on the link at see what sort of mess it makes on the top page - please remove: remember that the first 5 lines will show on the banner page! Put the diagnostics in there and leave out the superfluous stuff and details from the top.

* Please add the Tag "Family Banner Page" - to allow quick searches of those families that have been done! (or "Order Banner Page" or "Genus Banner Page", etc.)

* Heywood, V. 1993. is surely out of date: have many of our concepts not changed since then? Please check that this account includes the families that have been sunk, otherwise your features will be for the "old" family, not the "new" one.

&

* Do not use the family (e.g. "Malvaceae") tag: it is a waste of time. No one is going to tag all observations: Rather use the 'family search' within html. In this case < a href="/species_dictionary/Malvaceae" > Malvaceae < /a > (remove spaces around < and > to activate).
(I will remove the Malvaceae tag soon: it is confusing, results in useless searches and a waste of time - leaving it to convince you: have added the family tag for you to see how useful it is - and you can navigate it!). Note that this is what you will get if you click on the Taxonomy Link for the family from any species linked to the dictionary!

* In the first picture - the one that shows up on the thumbnail and banner, please put in a nice 'cover' picture - not some feature that does not deserve cover page!

Cover pic

will be added as soon as I have a good one! If anyone wants to contribute pics to this ob, please click on the link below and email me. Do not send me enormous files because I will hunt you down and make you live a long, long, long time (though you'll wish you were dead). Stuff for this page can be 72 dpi but must be at least 800 pixels WIDE. You will be credited. And if you have the pics on a species observation, I will link it there.

?

>> And click on the link at see what sort of mess it makes on the top page - please remove:

What does that mean?

I am leaving the note about micro characters IN - people often want to know what makes a family a family, and this is hard to show if it involves micro characters - but I have moved it down below.

I see you put Family baner page in. Have removed Malvaceae tag.

Vernon is my best bud for plant families (no I don't actually know him, but his book is FAB), and I have taken all his descriptions for Malvaceae, Tiliaceae, Sterculiaceae and Bombacaceae and put them all together. And I have noted the sunk families in the top line.

Heywood et al (edn2) 2007

Heywood, V, Brummitt, R & Culham, A. 2007. Flowering plant families of the world. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. R

editing tip!

I presume that you are aware that you can make the editing pane larger.
On the bottom right hand corner are 2 diagonal lines: drag this to the bottom right to allow you to see longer lines and more screen in the editing pane. There is also a triple line on the bottom to make the editing pane deeper.

This is only for editing: the displayed panel fits into the thread margins.

Just in case you had not noticed!

Error

OUCU login failed.

Taxonomy links

User login